This week’s theme stressed the importance to evaluate the design process and ideas of any project in order to ensure quality outcome. During the lecture by Haibo Li we received recommend paths to follow and traps to avoid. Li presented how to filter ideas, which would be used to shape the idea to suit the context. He asked questions such as: Does it address a real problem? Does it appeal to the market? Is the timing right? Is it something we are good at? By answering these questions we can notice what precautions to take and what sub-ideas to focus on; to empower our strengths and discard our weaknesses.
Further he warned us for pitfalls such as tunnel vision. A concept although we, or at least I, already had heard and knew about but was still worth mentioning in this context. By doing so we had the warning fresh and in context which then lessened the risk for exposure in upcoming design processes.
As to whether the idea was valid from the start, Li posed the scenario of the bear attack. What would be the strategy to survive if two people were chased by a bear? Well, one of the two would have to outrun the other, not the bear. A similar analogy is: a mother asks her daughter what she would do if she were to encounter a creepy man asking her to come with him. The daughter replied - I would pull down his pants and pull my skirt up. The mother raged back - Are you insane? Why would you do that? The daughter then confidently said - Well who do you think would run faster, the man with his pants down or me with my skirt up? Both examples reveal that the initial and often logical idea and solution might not be the best one. Think outside the box and re-evaluate each step to attack the task from different angles.
To re-evaluate your ideas is something I must work more on. It is often easy to get narrow-minded and stuck in your first decent idea. Even though you might get stuck with that idea it can be hard to step out of that mindset and try again from scratch. But that is exactly what you must do to come further. I’ve experienced this a few times during programming. When I’ve gotten stuck with but can’t find the faulty code, I open a clean slate and start from scratch. And in most cases it actually helps. Even though I might not have previously reflected upon it, I now have thanks to Haibo’s lecture which will make me more efficient in the future.
Hi Gunnar,
SvaraRaderaI really liked your example with the daughter and mother, things like that brightens up your mood when reading lots of blog posts! The re-evaluation part is something that I also think is really important when it comes to the kind of research that we conduct in our field of science. The iterative process on research and developing is key for success, I believe. I'm glad that Haibo's lecture helped you to reflect more on this "issue" and that you hopefully will change the way you work in the future!
It would have been nice to read your take on Anders Lundströms lecture as well!
Hi! I enjoy reading your reflection. You gave great example of mother and daughter. You showed creative approach to problem that bring about right solution.
SvaraRaderaI think that questions to idea that you've mentioned are mainly applicable for business idea than for idea of research. These questions can help to define the limitations of suggested concept, in design research prototype performs the same function, it allows to define limitations of idea.
Hi,
SvaraRaderaI like the fact that you wrote more about your personal opinion and how the first lecture reflect on your life and studies. Reevaluation is important when it comes to research. Also, a suggestion of Haibo was to not always believe ourselves. Mean that we are not perfect and by hesitate our thoughts and our ideas we will end up with better results. I didn’t really like the context of the example about the creepy man, but I got the point of it. I would have like to read how the second lesson reflects on you.
Hey!
SvaraRaderaVery good reflection and great summation of key points from the Haibo lecture. I really enjoyed your example with the daughter and her mother. Very funny!! :)
I agree that we all a lot off time suffer from tunnel vision and don't take a step back and rethink the situation. This happens to me very often and it is hard to just remove yourself from you work and to look at it from a different perspective. I think I get too attached to it and am afraid that I will have to discard some parts of it even though I worked for a long time on it.
Hi! I really liked you reflection and your seemed to really have gotten a lot out of Habio's lecture. I also liked your other example of problem solving rather than the bear example, it made it all very clear and it was funny! :D
SvaraRaderaWhat I do wonder is what you thought about the papers and if you learned anything new? Do you think prototypes are a good way of making the design process more tangible?
Good job!
/Maria
Nice reflection, I like that you had your own thoughts and examples about Haibo's lecture. However, as some above me said, there is nothing on the other lecture of the week, nor anything concerning the papers we read or something like that.
SvaraRaderaHello Gunnar,
SvaraRaderaI think you have written a very interesting blog post that highlights the main concepts and ideas of this week's theme. I agree it's very important for us engineers to actually learn to think out of the box, to find some new angle through which we could see the problem again, in a new light. I like the parallel you drew with you restarting from scratch when faced with a programming problem - I often do that as well, and didn't think to compare this to what we learnt this week !
Thank you for a very interesting and thought provoking blog post :-)
Hi,
SvaraRaderaYour reflection is very interesting and easy to follow. I like your writing style very much. You are so good at summarizing the key points for the first lecture that it gave us 'the paths to follow and traps to avoid'. In addition, your example of 'mother and daughter' as well as your own experience on programming are also insightful and helpful to better understand the key point you argued. What is a small pity here is that you did not say much on another key term 'prototype'. It would be great if you can also share your insightful ideas on that too. Anyway, very good job on your reflection. Thanks for your sharing!